13 Districts 95 Blocks 1,765 Sub-centres 239 PHCs 55 CHCs 12,018 ASHAs
Section · Overview

Overview

State-level snapshot · how Uttarakhand's health system is shaped

Exhibit AInteractive District Map
Click any district to load its file
Source · Rural Health Statistics MoHFW · OSM tiles · india-maps-data (CC BY 4.0)
Exhibit BFacility Distribution by District
2,097 facilities · MoHFW RHS
1,765Sub-centres
239Primary HCs
55Community HCs
20Sub-District H
18District H
2,097Total facilities
Click a column header to sort · click a row to load that district on the map above.
District SC PHC CHC SDH DH Total
State total 1,765 239 55 20 18 2,097
Source · MoHFW Rural Health Statistics, district-wise health centres. Mini-bars in each cell are normalised within the column — longest bar is the column maximum.
Exhibit CBlock Density per District
95 dev. blocks · 13 districts

Each district is administratively split into development blocks, the unit at which Block Health Societies operate and BMOICs sit. Pauri Garhwal, the largest district by area, runs 15 blocks; Rudraprayag and Bageshwar manage with 3 each.

  • 01Pauri Garhwal15
  • 02Almora11
  • 03Tehri Garhwal9
  • 03Chamoli9
  • 05Pithoragarh8
  • 05Nainital8
  • 07Udham Singh Nagar7
  • 08Dehradun6
  • 08Haridwar6
  • 08Uttarkashi6
  • 11Champawat4
  • 12Bageshwar3
  • 12Rudraprayag3
Source · NHM Uttarakhand 24×7 facility roster · Each block runs 1 BMOIC + 1 BPMU team (BPM, BAM, BDM, BCM).
Exhibit DSix-year trend · how the state has evolved

Annual snapshots of facility counts and AAM rollout from FY 2018-19 to FY 2023-24. The dominant trend is AAM growth — from zero in 2018 to 2,186 operational by August 2024 — alongside gradual sub-centre consolidation.

Source: MoHFW RHS 2018-19 → Health Dynamics 2022-23 · AAM Operational Dashboard · values bound to DATA.timeSeries.
Exhibit EHill states · how Uttarakhand stacks up

Comparison with peer hill states — same 90:10 funding ratio, similar terrain challenges — plus the all-India per-crore-population baseline. Numbers normalised to population so smaller states (Sikkim) aren’t penalised.

Source: MoHFW Rural Health Statistics 2022-23, CAG audit reports · bound to DATA.hillStates.
Exhibit FNHM impact · what moved between 2015 and 2021

Inputs (facilities, money, AAMs) finally meet outputs. Every facility-tab in this document tells you what was built. This exhibit tells you whether it worked. Indicators are NFHS-4 (2015-16) vs NFHS-5 (2019-21) — the only two rounds available; NFHS-6 fieldwork is ongoing.

A note on timing

NFHS-5 fieldwork in Uttarakhand was completed by March 2021. That means it predates most of the AAM rollout (which scaled from 892 operational in FY 2020-21 to 2,186 in FY 2023-24). So the gains shown below come from the pre-AAM NHM architecture: facility upgrades, JSY/JSSK incentives, Mission Indradhanush, the ASHA cadre, and SUMAN. The next NFHS round will tell us whether the AAM scale-up moved the needle further.

Source: IIPS NFHS-4 (2015-16) & NFHS-5 (2019-21) Uttarakhand state factsheets · bound to DATA.outcomes.state.